Perfect fit.
->link<-

hopefully this means no presidential run in the future for her. It's scary to see the marriage of pundit and politician, though. Like Limbaugh or Beck with actual political (sketchy as it may be) cred.

everything rules about this. could not have gone better without grievous physical injury

Yall are real serious about what someone else does for work.

Garrett:Yall are real serious about what someone else does for work.

oh that's right no one should care about anything. i keep forgetting. sorry.

JUST SO LONG AS YOU HAVE A JOB AND NICE THINGS RIGHT GARRETT?

Andrewski:

Koger:hopefully this means no presidential run in the future for her.

occupant:i would still make out with her.

Josh Topic:

Garrett:Yall are real serious about what someone else does for work.

oh that's right no one should care about anything. i keep forgetting. sorry.

this truly has ZERO effect on any of our lives
I care about many things, but stuff like this is dumb. No one here likes her. No one here likes Fox news. So why do people care about her going to Fox news?
'well this means she wont run for president hopefully' etc etc - so what if she does, let her. If she sucks then she wont make it to the final election, same as about 10 other canidates in the last election

Yall get worked up over mess that has no bearing on your life at all.

And yes, like Mike, I'd make out with her. But then pose a question on a possible three-way with her and her daughter, and they'd both agree.

Garrett:
Yall get worked up over mess that has no bearing on your life at all.

you are currently the most worked up in this thread in regard to post tone.

Garrett-And yes, like Mike, I'd make out with her. But then pose a question on a possible three-way with her and her daughter, and they'd both agree.

^^This made my morning.

Garrett:
Kevin, in regard to post tone? I didn't feel like I used any words or phrases that had a lot of energy in them, so I think you are way off base.
Or as you'd say "you're turbo wrong"

I think I'm referring more to the fact up until your post replies had been approximately 2 lines at most. Your post is a multi paragraph indictment of said posts complete with exactly one all caps word for emphasis and remarks with the intent to engage or belittle those above. You also used several absolute statements.These factors contributed to my analysis of your post as being the "...most worked up..."

Garrett:Josh, you feel their news is very biased already, what's one more person?
No josh, no lives are changing because she took this job. Well none that aren't directly connected to her or the fox news organization etc

There is a direct possibility lives will change because of this statement. The correlation between the actions of the republican party and the rhetoric of pundits like Bill O'Reilly and Glen Beck is too strong to ignore. In the current vacuum of cohesion within the party strongholds these pundits are, in many ways, helping to create policy and sway voter opinion. Please see the Tea Party movement of the past year. While it may not result in Sara Palin physically altering your life in the immediate future, her presence as a media commentator has excellent potential to change policy indirectly in spheres like health reform, foreign affairs etc. This is turn will, for better or worse, affect your tax dollars and how they are spent.

Youre both wrong.

dude, read my post, im trying to holler at mom and daughter